NewScribe v2 is generally available. Handles multi-speaker visits in 23 languages.Read the launch note →
Sign in →Help CenterCall sales+1 (917) 735-8266
Compare

Switching EMRs is hard. Staying on the wrong one is harder.

Every month on manual note-writing, denied claims, and disconnected tools costs more than the migration. We built these comparisons to be honest — not every clinic needs Trustro.

Side-by-side feature comparison

FeatureTrustroJaneSPathenaTebraDrChrono
Native AI scribe
Billing-code suggestion
Denial-resolution agentPartialPartial
SOC 2 Type II
Multi-location billing
Arabic / RTL portal
Telehealth included
Lab orders & results
Implementation < 14 daysPartial
Transparent pricing

Based on publicly available feature documentation. Last verified May 2026.

Detailed comparisons

Trustro vs.

Jane.app

Jane.app is well-built for allied health — physiotherapy, chiropractic, massage therapy. If your practice has outgrown its billing automation, needs native AI scribing, or serves a multilingual patient population, the comparison is worth your time.

Their strengths: Strong scheduling UX, allied health focus, SOC 2 certified
Where Trustro differs: No native AI agents, no Arabic/RTL portal, limited denial automation
Read full comparison
Trustro vs.

SimplePractice

SimplePractice is popular in behavioral health — therapists, counselors, psychologists. It handles notes and scheduling well for solo providers. If you are scaling beyond solo or want AI native to your charting, see how they differ.

Their strengths: Large behavioral health user base, mature telehealth, good onboarding
Where Trustro differs: AI features added to existing architecture, limited multi-location billing
Read full comparison
Trustro vs.

athenahealth

athenahealth is a large enterprise EMR with strong revenue cycle management. If you want the same clinical depth with native AI agents, simpler implementation, and transparent pricing, this comparison matters.

Their strengths: Deep revenue cycle, large group billing, enterprise scale
Where Trustro differs: Complex implementation (3-6 months), % of collections pricing, no native AI scribe
Read full comparison
Trustro vs.

Tebra

Tebra (formerly Kareo + PatientPop) combines practice management with patient marketing. If you need deeper clinical charting with AI agents alongside billing, see how the platforms compare.

Their strengths: Practice marketing, patient acquisition, all-in-one billing
Where Trustro differs: No native AI scribe, limited lab order management, no RTL portal
Read full comparison
Trustro vs.

DrChrono

DrChrono is an iPad-first cloud EHR popular with independent practices. If you want native AI agents and deeper billing automation without third-party integrations, this comparison is for you.

Their strengths: iPad-first design, customizable forms, App marketplace
Where Trustro differs: AI via third-party integrations, no native denial resolution, no RTL portal
Read full comparison

The best comparison is a live demo.

Bring your current EMR open in one tab. We open Trustro in the other. Same workflow, side by side, 30 minutes.

Book a demo